Logo

AWS Elastic File System vs Google Cloud Filestore

January 18, 2022

Introduction

As more and more businesses move towards cloud computing, cloud storage services have become all the rage. AWS Elastic File System and Google Cloud Filestore are two such cloud storage services. They both offer scalable file storage solutions, but which one is better? In this blog post, we will do a comparative analysis of AWS Elastic File System and Google Cloud Filestore and help you make an informed decision.

Benefits and Features

AWS Elastic File System

Benefits:

  • Scalability: AWS Elastic File System can scale to petabytes of data with practically infinite file system capacity.

  • Shared Access: Multiple instances can share access to a single file system simultaneously.

  • Fully Managed: AWS Elastic File System is a fully managed service, which means that you don't need to worry about the underlying infrastructure.

  • Performance: With AWS Elastic File System, you can achieve high IOPS, low latency, and high throughput.

Features:

  • File System Access: AWS Elastic File System provides file system access to Amazon EC2 instances and other services such as Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), and AWS Batch.

  • Multi-AZ Support: AWS Elastic File System provides multi-AZ support, which ensures high availability and durability of your data.

  • Encryption: AWS Elastic File System uses encryption-at-rest to secure your data.

  • Integration: AWS Elastic File System integrates with other AWS services such as AWS DataSync, AWS Backup, and AWS CloudFormation.

Google Cloud Filestore

Benefits:

  • Performance: Google Cloud Filestore provides high IOPS, low latency and high throughput performance.

  • Fully Managed: Google Cloud Filestore is a fully managed service, which means that you don't need to worry about the underlying infrastructure.

  • Scalability: Google Cloud Filestore can scale up to 64 TB of data without any disruption.

  • High Availability: Google Cloud Filestore provides high availability through its multiple replicas.

Features:

  • File System Access: Google Cloud Filestore provides file system access via NFS to Google Compute Engine (GCE) instances.

  • Backups: Google Cloud Filestore provides automatic backups, which can be used for disaster recovery.

  • Security: Google Cloud Filestore uses Encryption at Rest to secure your data.

  • Integration: Google Cloud Filestore integrates with other Google Cloud services such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and Google Big Data services.

Performance

When it comes to performance, both services have their own unique features.

AWS Elastic File System Performance:

AWS Elastic File System is designed to provide low latency and high throughput. It can support up to 10 GB/s of throughput and up to 10,000 IOPS. This makes it a great option for applications that require low-latency access to shared files.

Google Cloud Filestore Performance:

Google Cloud Filestore can support up to 16 GB/s of throughput and up to 500,000 IOPS. It also provides low-latency access to shared files, making it ideal for applications that require consistent and high-performance file storage.

Pricing

Both AWS Elastic File System and Google Cloud Filestore have a pay-as-you-go pricing model.

AWS Elastic File System Pricing:

AWS Elastic File System pricing depends on the storage capacity, throughput, and requests. The cost starts at $0.30 per GB-month of storage and $0.10 per GB-month of throughput.

Google Cloud Filestore Pricing:

Google Cloud Filestore pricing depends on the storage capacity and throughput. The cost starts at $0.30 per GB of storage per month and $0.20 per GB of throughput per month.

Conclusion

Both AWS Elastic File System and Google Cloud Filestore offer impressive storage solutions with their own unique features. AWS Elastic File System is a great option for applications that require low-latency access to shared files, while Google Cloud Filestore is ideal for applications that require consistent high-performance file storage.

Ultimately, the decision between AWS Elastic File System and Google Cloud Filestore depends on your specific needs and budget. We hope that this comparison helps you make an informed decision.

References

  1. AWS Elastic File System - https://aws.amazon.com/efs/
  2. Google Cloud Filestore - https://cloud.google.com/filestore
  3. AWS Compare Services Page - https://aws.amazon.com/compare/
  4. Google Cloud's Filestore vs EFS by Softura Inc (2022) - https://www.softura.com/filestore-vs-efs/
© 2023 Flare Compare